Thursday, July 24, 2008

Oops! US$ 1.48 b loss!!

Temasek Selling Merrill Lynch

Half or total of 87m shares have been sold off at a loss, according to US recorded filings.

By Seah Chiang Nee
Jul 24, 2008


Temasek Holdings has sold off half its ill-timed investment in Merrill Lynch - or about 87m shares, according to a mutual funds report on institutional trades on US stocks.

The online report, MFFAIRS (Mutual Fund Facts About Individual Stocks), reported it sold off 86,949,594 shares (50%), leaving a current holdings of 86,949,594 shares (50%), according to the filings made public.

The report gave no exact date or price of the sale.

Neither has there been any confirmation from Temasek, which had paid US$48 a share last year.
http://www.mffais.com/newsarticles/2...37-211738.html

Last week Merrill Lynch was traded at $31.

At that price Temasek would have suffered a loss of $17 a share - or a total loss of about US$1.48b for the 87mil shares.

Despite massive write-downs and capital injection, Merrill Lynch’s outlook remains uncertain, reports Bloomberg.

The company’s equity capital position is weak relative to competitors, said Brad Hintz, a New York-based analyst at Sanford C Bernstein, reports Ambereen Choudhury.

“With $19.9b in CDOs still frozen on the balance sheet and with counterparty risk rising on the hedges underlying these troubled positions, the potential for additional material write-downs remains a concern,” Hintz said.

The New York-based firm’s credit rating was cut last week by Moody’s Investors Service to A2 from A1.

The third-biggest US securities firm probably will report a loss of $6.57 a share this year, compared with an earlier forecast of $1.07, Hintz said.

The revised estimate assumes the company generates no earnings in the second half.

Merrill may have to take an additional $10 billion of pre-tax write-downs related to its holdings of mortgage securities, Moody’s estimates.

Huge paper losses

The disposal leaves Temasek Holdings and the Government Investment Corporation (GIC) still holding substantial parts of big troubled Western banks.

Its remaining investments in UBS (Switzerland), Citigroup, Barclays and Merrill Lynch - at an original cost of US$21.88b - have declined on by some 47 percent in value.

That is a paper loss of US$10.28b. However, Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew had said these investments were made as a long-term strategy of 30 years.

But as the Merrill Lynch sale shows, Temasek is not inflexible about cutting losses, if things threaten to get worse.

The political leadership has defended its investment of these sub-prime banks as “an opportunistic” foray that can happen once in a long while.

It believes these companies will survive the crisis and emerge stronger.

Some experts believe that Temasek has made an error of judgment.

Investment guru Jim Rogers said in July he believed that US bank stocks could fall further and predicted that Singapore’s state investors would lose money on Citigroup and Merrill Lynch.

“I’m shorting investment banks on Wall Street,” the successful investor said. “It grieves me to see what Singapore is doing. They are going to lose money.”

At the Nomura Dialogue recently, Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew reported to investment mistakes, but that no one had benefited from it.

Singaporeans who want to see greater transparency in the government’s investments in troubled companies are unhappy with this vague answer to a serious problem.

One writer said, “Should we just move on? I do not think so. The patently huge mistake is not merely the result of recklessness but rather a systemic lack of accountability in making some of our largest investments.

“Let it be clear, the harm is terminally done. The entire reserves system must be re-examined and audited.”

Said slohand, “I saw the interview on TV last night and felt shortchanged.

He brushed aside the issues with the logic that since the officers who made the decisions were not the beneficiaries in any sense of the word, such lapses are mistakes and are therefore acceptable...

“..The size indicates that it can only come from the very top.”

The skies are dark but the storm has not broke yet.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Temasek filed an amendment as additional holdings and then relisted their previous ownerships, hence the double shares.

Mffias.com did make an exception of using only SEC filings verbatiem and corrected the number of shares.

Mffais.com originally reported is what was reported to the SEC by Temasek themselves.

Regards,

Kevin
Mffais.com

In July 2nd, they filed this report for CPOR of 20080331
Source: http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1021944/000119312508145958/0001193125-08-145958.txt

In July 22nd, the file this amended report holding additional
shares(see additional holdings is checked on amendment it is
NOT a reinstatement) for CPOR of 20080331
Source http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1021944/000119312508155359/0001193125-08-155359.txt

Also on July 22nd, they filed this report for CPOR of 20080630
Source: http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1021944/000119312508155318/0001193125-
08-155318.txt

Hence, the summary of them selling 1/2 shares of their holdings.

Nobody said...

Temasek has come out explaining the rumour that it has sold any of its Merrill Lynch shares. See http://bloggingr4life.blogspot.com/2008/07/temasek-stake-in-merrill-unchanged.html

Thanks for clarification.

Nobody said...

Here's another comment from Mr Seah CN on the matter:

Merrill Lynch
Only 5m were sold, sources
Sale did take place but it was only 5m shares - not 86.9m, which was misreported due to a filing glitch. By Seah Chiang Nee
Jul 26, 2008

Temasek Holdings has sold 5m Merrill Lynch shares, not 86.9m, which was wrongly reported because of a fiing glitch.

The erroneous information was picked up by a California-based firm Mutual Fund Facts About Individual Stocks (MFFAIS), according to the Straits Times obviously after talking to Temasek insiders.

Temasek did not confirm or deny the MFFAIS report yesterday (obviously following its tradition of not commenting on repors of its trades).

What had caused the glitch was not explained.

Its spokesman Myrna Thomas told local and foreign media: "Investors and the interested public are advised to refer only to official sources of information for announcements on major transactions".

The Straits Times reported that a check had found a Jan 3 SEC filing by Temasek showing that the company held 91.67m shares, or 9.4 per cent of Merrill, as at Dec 24.

Then, on May 15, Temasek made another filing stating that it owned 86.95 million shares in Merrill as at March 31, it added.

"That represents a stake of 8.85 per cent, according to Bloomberg data on June 30.
So, in other words, Temasek did not sell 87 million Merrill shares, but more like five million."

Apparently quoting from insider sources, it said, "The Straits Times understands that Temasek had to trim its total stake after it exercised the option to purchase an additional 12.5mn shares in February.

"This is to keep below the 10 per cent threshold for foreign investors' shareholdings in a US financial institution, mandated by the authorities.

"So it may have sold off a few million shares to meet the requirements, say sources."

The sale represents a loss, but a negligent one relatively to the large size, and no where as big as it would have been, if 86.9m shares had been sold. Merrill Lynch share price has dropped by 43% since Temasek first bought into the troubled bank.
By Seah Chiang Nee

http://www.littlespeck.com/content/economy/CTrendsEconomy-080726.htm