Anwar’s Long-Shot Gamble
Mageswary Ramakrishnan
 February 2007 
Anwar Ibrahim, still seeking to be Prime Minister, is challenging Malaysia’s  entire political structure to win the prize
Out of prison and looking to  resume his political life, Anwar Ibrahim, the once and -- he hopes -- future  heir apparent to Malaysia’s premiership, is gambling on returning to power by  doing what has never been done before: confronting the country’s race-based  politics and trying to break the 60-year reign of the ruling United Malays  National Organization.
In the Malaysian racial balancing act, ethnic  Malays have enjoyed targeted economic preferences for almost 40 years,  ostensibly to ease once-tense relations with the prosperous Chinese minority.  The government has refused to budge on the system but Anwar says preferences  have failed and are contributing to rising tension.
“Certainly there is  a growing tension which we have not seen since the late 60’s but the UMNO-led  government is in a constant state of denial,” Anwar said in an interview with  Asia Sentinel.
With that as a starting point, Anwar says he intends to  seek the office that eluded him 10 years ago when he tangled with his one-time  mentor, former Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad. He was ousted as deputy prime  minister and jailed for six years on charges of corruption and sexual perversion  that are almost universally regarded as trumped up. Since his release in 2004  following Mahathir’s retirement, Anwar has largely been outside Malaysia,  lecturing at universities in the United States and maintaining that Mahathir’s  government went after him to end his political career after he called attention  to the endemic corruption in the party.
He returned last year, lambasting  the Barisan Nasional, the country’s race-based ruling coalition, in well-attended public gatherings across the  country. The coalition, he says, dishes out contracts to UMNO-linked  businessmen, tarnishes the rule of law and deludes the ethnic Malay majority  with promises of wealth via failed affirmative action policies.
Anwar,  who turns 60 this year, has launched a media blitz in anticipation of his return  to the electoral arena, giving interviews to anybody who wants to listen. He  says he will contest the next election if it is held after April 2008. He is  barred from politics until that time because of his prison sentence. Malaysia's  Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, who led a coalition of parties to victory  in 2004, must call an election by early 2009.
Following disastrous race  riots between the economically powerful Chinese minority and ethnic Malays that  killed hundreds in 1969, the government instituted its New Economic Policy in  1970 to attempt to bridge the economic gap between the two races. The policies  continue and increasingly draw criticism from opposition politicians and  non-governmental organizations. Efforts to get the government to discontinue the  preferences have come to a naught, incurring the wrath of Chinese and Indians  who feel the government has helped the Malays enough.
But, Anwar says, the  NEP must go simply because it has not looked into the economic well-being of the  Malays but helped line the wallets of the ruling elite.
 “There has been  no trickle-down effect to the poor,” he says. “It’s been benefiting the  government and leaders of the ruling UMNO and not the poor Malays.” He is  certain, he says, that his message would be well-received by the Malays, who  form UMNO’s grassroots support.
 “For 30 years, UMNO has told the Malays  that the NEP is to help them. But the crux is to the contrary. I will have to  make the Malays understand a few hundred million shares have been taken by the  ruling elite under the name of the NEP and that the poor Malays got nothing.” 
In the NEP’s place, Anwar proposes a national policy which targets poverty  eradication and promotes economic well-being irrespective of race.  Academics  warn the idea seems more feasible on paper, despite the fact that it is  spearheaded by Anwar. Their argument is simple – it is an uphill task to get the  Malays to understand the NEP was a failure. “The Malays would also want to  maintain their superior status among the races,” says an analyst who declined to  be named.
Certainly, some academics consider the NEP a failure. The  policy gave rise to unequal development of the Malay community – the exact  reverse of the policy’s intent. The plan created a small Malay bourgeoisie  closely associated with the UMNO elite, disparagingly called the UMNOputra (a  play on the Malay bumiputra, or sons of the soil) and a large working class.  A  Malaysian think-tank set off a firestorm in October by suggesting in a study  that ethnic Malays now own an eye-popping 45 percent of Malaysia’s publicly  listed corporate equity, far above the goal of 30 percent set by the NEP. The  government insists that ethnic Malays control only 19 percent. The study was  dismissed by UMNO leaders, who said it was intended to incite anger and confuse  Malays.  But other critics said what the NEP had done was to create a gilded and  unproductive elite that take their education and jobs for granted while dong  nothing for rural Malays.
While on the surface it looks as if racial  harmony is maintained, tensions continue to brew between the three major ethnic  groups.  Ethnic Malays comprise some 60 percent of the population and the  Chinese 26 percent, with Indians and indigenous groups making up the  rest.
The Malaysian government has so far kept a tight lid on racial tensions  despite ethnic clashes that periodically bring reminders of the murderous 1969  violence. In 2001, for instance, there were clashes between Indians and Malays  in the suburbs of Kuala Lumpur, the capital city.
What exacerbates the tension further is the  inability of the Chinese and Indians to question special rights and privileges  accorded to the Malays. Debates on race relations are considered too sensitive  in Malaysia. It remains a topic for heated discussion in tea  stalls.
 “This is the result of direct threats issued by UMNO. Non-Malays  are strictly warned against talking about Malay rights, NEP, race relations and  issues relating to Islam,” said Anwar.
UMNO has led the ruling coalition  since independence from British colonial rule in 1957.  Anwar is now a member of  the Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) or People’s Justice Party founded and led by his  wife, Wan Azizah Wan Ismail. On the face of it, he appears to have virtually no  chance of taking the premiership from outside UMNO, particularly because over  the recent past ethnic Malay xenophobia has been on the rise. With Anwar arguing  for a departure from race-based politics, his task seems impossible.
But  there are new factors that could upset the equation, particularly allegations of  corruption at the top of UMNO. Najib Tun Razak, the deputy prime minister and  son of onetime Prime Minister Tun Abdul Razak, faces increasingly serious  charges of corruption that could wreak havoc on UMNO.
Najib has  previously been impervious to corruption charges, particularly over a huge  commission paid to his family for the purchase of submarines for the Malaysian  navy, but he has come under additional scrutiny over questions about his role,  if any, in murder charges against a prominent Malaysian political analyst with  close ties to some of the country’s top political figures.
Abdul Razak  Baginda, 46, and two members of a special police unit under Najib that normally  exists to protect diplomats, face charges in the murder of a young Mongolian  woman, Altantuya Shaariibuu, whose body was found in a patch of jungle near the  Kuala Lumpur suburb of Shah Alam in November. She had reportedly been shot twice  and torn apart with hand grenades available only to Malaysia’s security forces  after trying to get Abdul Razak to acknowledge fathering her baby.  
Perceiving weakness, Anwar has launched a ferocious assault on Najib and  UMNO over arms purchases carried out by the Defense Ministry while also  demanding that police investigate Najib’s ties, if any, to the indicted figures  and Altantuya.
But if he pursues his course on the race issue, Anwar  could risk new trouble. Prime Minister Abdullah has made it very clear that race  relations and Islam are off limits in order to maintain national harmony. Public  debates regarding the two issues could be deemed a threat to national security,  warranting summary detention under the Internal Security Act (ISA).
UMNO leaders have been  only too happy to echo Abdullah’s call. Late last year, the premier’s son-in-law  Khairy Jamaluddin told the media that the Chinese community in Malaysia will  take advantage of the Malays if UMNO is weak. This not only prompted an outburst  from parties within the ruling coalition front but also from senior UMNO  members. Abdullah defended Khairy by saying the press had misquoted him; he  refused to apologize and agreed his comments are important to defend Malay  rights and Islam.
Reinforcing the off-limits policy, the leadership  silenced debate on the burial of national hero M.Moorthy last year, whose Muslim  identity was in question. An Islamic shariah court declared that Moorthy, the  first Malaysian to climb Mount Everest, had converted to Islam before his death.  The Islamic tribunal did not give a chance for his wife to give evidence as she  is not a Muslim.
Surprisingly the nation’s High Court ruled that it had  no jurisdiction in religious matters and could not override the shariah court in  such matters. Moorthy was finally buried a Muslim, whether he actually was or  not. 
Abdullah’s administration quelled public debate on the matter.  Anwar, on the other hand, has vehemently condemned the way the case was dealt  with. “While speaking in a Muslim rural heartland in Kedah (northern state), I  told the people it was wrong for the High Court to deny Moorthy’s wife, who is  clearly a non-Muslim, the right to be heard in a civil court.”
Comments  like these have earned Anwar the wrath of the government. A recent public speech  was refused a police permit. But whether this signals a renewed desire to curb  Anwar’s rising popularity remains to be seen.  While there is little doubt that  Anwar can pull in crowds, Parti Keadilan Rakyat has little mass support.  Political observers say Wan Azizah lacks the charm of a leader, and Anwar simply  went missing from the local political scene after his acquittal.
 “I  know I was away for 18 months, lecturing in the US. But I needed the money to  support my family. Primarily I needed the international recognition to help me  garner support in Malaysia,” he says.
Whatever the reasons, PKR has  gained little traction. The Democratic Action Party (DAP) enjoys the support of  the opposition Chinese. The Islamist Parti Islam Se-Malaysia (PAS) is popular  among rural Malays in the northeastern state of Kelantan and Terengganu. PKR, a  marginal multi-racial party, remains in limbo.
Anwar is confident that  PKR can pull up its socks before the polls, which analysts say will be called by  the end of 2007.  “We are committed to a reform plan; Reform of the judiciary,  administration and the working system of the government. UMNO is, on the other  hand, corrupt to the core. I am sure the people will support us.”
No comments:
Post a Comment